Comments on: Re-reading Is Not For Memorization http://ztkfg.com/2019/12/re-reading-is-not-for-memorization/ 198.211.113.164 // 6326 273B 61A7 00AF 4CD9 5A7B 8C6C AB19 24A6 4DEC Fri, 17 Apr 2026 21:35:05 +0000 http://polimedia.us hourly 1 By: The Story Told to Alcinoüs - the Cyclops « whaack http://ztkfg.com/2019/12/re-reading-is-not-for-memorization/#comment-196 The Story Told to Alcinoüs - the Cyclops « whaack Thu, 06 Feb 2020 05:20:15 +0000 http://ztkfg.com/?p=382#comment-196 [...] audience in Alcinoüs's hall. But unfortunately for Odysseus, I have the luxury of being able to reread and re-frame his [...] [...] audience in Alcinoüs's hall. But unfortunately for Odysseus, I have the luxury of being able to reread and re-frame his [...]

]]> By: whaack http://ztkfg.com/2019/12/re-reading-is-not-for-memorization/#comment-116 whaack Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:39:56 +0000 http://ztkfg.com/?p=382#comment-116 Going along with the first part of your comment, this will be a fun article to revisit every year or so. Re-reading the second to last paragraph, I see my mind attempting to describe its self analysis process in tandem with (or in the guise of) trying to describe digesting literature in general. Going along with the first part of your comment, this will be a fun article to revisit every year or so.

Re-reading the second to last paragraph, I see my mind attempting to describe its self analysis process in tandem with (or in the guise of) trying to describe digesting literature in general.

]]> By: Diana Coman http://ztkfg.com/2019/12/re-reading-is-not-for-memorization/#comment-115 Diana Coman Sat, 14 Dec 2019 09:21:54 +0000 http://ztkfg.com/?p=382#comment-115 The you who reads the 2nd (or 100th) time is also not quite the same you that read that text the first time. In other words, the intricacy is not as much from an abstract notion of "literature" but from the underlying life that has to seep into a text if it's to have any chance of being literature as opposed to advertisement or noise. For the practical exercise: what do you get out of re-reading your own text above? :D The you who reads the 2nd (or 100th) time is also not quite the same you that read that text the first time. In other words, the intricacy is not as much from an abstract notion of "literature" but from the underlying life that has to seep into a text if it's to have any chance of being literature as opposed to advertisement or noise.

For the practical exercise: what do you get out of re-reading your own text above? :D

]]>